It seems as if I've embarrassed Cuntus McCollins into a massive bout of backpedalling and furious and hasty revision of his plagiarised sonic. Result! But I'll get onto that later.
On a more disturbing note is the defence of this fetid piece of dickcheese by possibly one of the thickest, most closeminded and gullible windowlickers on the planet, our old friend Anakin Starkiller/Dan Stokes. Honestly, either this bell end is being deliberately blind to the quite overwhelming proof of Collins' recasting antics or he genuinely is just full-retard. He claims that Collins could have arrived at the same design as mine independently and by looking at the rubbish public pics of the prop. Let's have a bit of fun with Stokes shall we? Here's what he wrote and as usual, my responses in RED:
"Right, so what are the specific points then to be addressed that argue that Rasslion reverse engineered a CT sonic rather than working off of pics of the original?
Since your miniscule little legume of a brain hasn't been able to process my previous blog, I'm going to have spell it out to you:
1) The shallow lens cap recess - The original was much deeper. I put that in as it allowed me to fix the height in which the lens cap would sit as the original prop's lens varied in the height it was installed.
2) The bisected strut - This is a feature that I pointed out, I provided proof in the form of the Aztec pictures. Until I did, the Aztec sonic was unheard of and no one even knew they made the sonic let alone knew their website.
3) The screw in ball coupler - Again, this is not an idea I am claiming sole ownership over, moreover I am claiming ownership over how it is executed. The cylindrical nature of the coupler finishing in a circular seam on the lower inside of the emitter head recess is something I first pointed out here on this blog and backed up with photographic proof that was NOT available online.
4) The cylindrical LED holder - Again this was something that is unique to my build and gained through my access to the prop. This was never seen on any publicly available photo and was argued about until I provided an enhanced pic that showed the seam in the upper part of the head recess.
5) Solid Anodized black bulb - I am the only person to have done this. It was something unique to my build and I added it for aesthetic reasons and reasons of balance. It just felt nicer to hold than the Delrin of the original prop.
6) The angle of the end tip - I deliberately altered the design of the black bulb to change it from the original prop including the dimensions of the black bulb which were a little smaller than the prop and had a distinctive tip end. This alteration is NOTICEABLY different and distinctive from the prop yet has been reproduced by Collins including the same angle of slope as mine. Stokes, I know you're a fucking deadhead but even you can see how different my black bulb is from the prop?
7) The slider plate - I made mine deliberately rectangular and is noticeably so from the prop. Look, Collins' slider plate also has this rectangular flaw. Funny that.
8) Overall dimensions - I know the dims of the Tennant prop because I measured it. My version is off on several of these dimensions including length and a specific lower diameter (some people will know precisely what diameter I am talking about - I held it over erroneously from my extrapolation of the Season 1-2 sonic). This mistake has been replicated in its entirety by Collins, something that should NEVER have happened if pics of the prop were used. In fact, the dimensions of Collins' build is closer to mine than to the actual prop and I have full sets of blueprints for both. Asp9mm will know precisely what I am talking about and i might even forward precisely what I mean to others too. You want to take me on Stokes? Really? I'd fucking mince you like I have with others who thought they could pull a fast one on me.
These are features that appear on my build, are unique to my build and were the result of research proprietory to ME. One feature appearing on someone else's build is a coincidence and can be put down to independent development but all 8?! Surely you're not that thick. Actually, don't answer that. I'm sure you're even more retarded than I give you credit for.
Is it the fact that the window in his emitter head intersects a little bit with the struts? This can be seen in the pic of the sonic posted on the Aztec website. Yes, CT is right in saying that his replica has this feature and the MFX sonic doesn't, but all that proves is that Rasslion didn't copy his replica from a MFX sonic. If the detail is on the original prop, and if that detail can be seen on publicly available pictures, then why would one think that Rassilon copied CT's work because his replica shares these details.
Before I pointed this out and before Aztec's involvement was publicly known, this picture and this feature was not noticed. Now I have pointed it out, it is difficult to 'unsee' but up until now the only place where this feature can be clearly seen is on my replica and if Collins has lifted other pieces of my design, it doesn't take Sherlock fucking Holmes to see where he got this other detail from now, does it? You fucking dunce.
Now, I don't know Rassilon at all. So, I have no reason to think one way or another that he would or would not work off of references from CT's site. But to me, having the emitter head and ball coupling screw together seems like an intuative engineering decision that two designers could have made independantly. (I mean they either screw together or they are glued together, those really are the only two options right?) And both CT and Rassilon seem like they were trying to replicate features of the orignal prop that can be seen on the original prop. Now CT may have some bragging rights for being able to have been the first person to publically call people's attention to certain details of the orignal prop. But working from details of the original prop that another member pointed out is not recasting. Directly copying another member's work is. CT states "Unless Cuntus McCollins has been living under Ayre's-****ing-rock for the past three years, there is no way he cannot have been unaware of my work" But being aware of the discoveries made by another hobbyist is not recasting. So, for an example, I was the first person to find an original accurate Armitage Shanks handwheel and show to the board that it broke down into four pieces and that the pommel cubes could be flipped. But when board members began to replicate these characteristics of the orignal prop in their designs, that was not re-casting. I did not own those features of the orignal prop just because I noticed them first.
Collins has a track record of stealing other people's work. He's a lazy thieving little cunt and lazy thieving little cunts take the path of least resistance when it comes to hard work. In this case, why should he bother doing all the research when it has already been done for him? If is was possible to create an accurate replica from publicly available pics why hasn't someone done it sooner? I know people like yourself and Phez have taken my discoveries on the prop and used them. It's easier to use other people's discoveries than to discover for yourself but be honest about it and don't try and showboat when you are standing on the shoulders of someone else. The Armitage Shanks handwheel example is clearly irrelevant here as it is a found object. Once you manage to get to your hands on a custom built prop kept under lock and key and document it, then come back to me. Until then, shut the fuck up you're embarrassing yourself.
For Rassilon to have re-cast CT's work, he would have had to reverse engineer CT's work--ie. buy a CT sonic and copy it, or maybe get someone to measure theirs and work backwards or some other direct lineage of copying. And I haven't heard evidence being discussed here that says that this is the case. CT says that his emitter head is an identical 1:1 replica of the emitter head of the Season 1 sliding sonic. So logically, if Rasslion was working off of pics of the season 1 slider, or these season 4 prop that Nick Robbato converted the season 1 slider into (which are available on the rubbertoe webcite) Rasslion's sonic would match CT's sonic in the features mentioned right?
You really are a total moron aren't you? I've already stated that Collins used pics of my sonic, which are plentiful on the net and better quality than ones of the prop and he scaled and measured them using a ruler. The fact that he has large error margins tells me this is the case. But tell me, how is it that Collins design conveniently matches mine on the areas you CANNOT see? How come the only part he admits to not being able to figure out are the only parts I have not shown pics of? You are such a blinkered and narrow minded fool, you're as bad as Phez Petter when it comes to believing what you want to believe in the face of overwhelming logic, common sense and irrefutable facts.
Also, in CT's blog post, he says that Rassilon copied Rouge Scout's Romana sonic, and CT portrays this as a pattern of re-casting by Rassilon. But as far as I remember, when Rassilon posted drawings of his Romana sonic, they looked quite a bit different from Rouge Scout's design.
Here's Rouge Scout's
http://www.therpf.com/attachments/f9...889d1320587487
Here's Rassilon's
http://www.therpf.com/attachments/f9...008d1322477661
In fact, the very fact that Rassilon went to such an effort to make a Romana sonic that is so very different from Rough Scout's would make me think that he's specifally trying hard not to copy another member's work.
But that's not what happened is it Dan? Roguescout made his last post on the 27th November forbidding his work to be used as any kind of reference for Collins' Romana build. Collins' then hurriedly changes his designs to avoid rocking the boat and posts pics of his build on the 28th November. The reason why he's specifically trying hard not to copy another's work is because his original was a direct rip off of Roguescout's, Roguescout got pissed off, pulled his work and in order not to be accused of recasting, he went out of his way to change the design. That sounds much more likely, doesn't it? Maybe you should ask Roguescout why he pulled his plans? Or do you think he's being unreasonable too?
So, I don't really see a pattern of recasting other members going on here.
That just about sums up your observational skills doesn't it? Thankfully others aren't as mentally deficient.
Also, if Rassilon was going to copy CT's work, why is the body of his sonic so completely different from either CT's season 1 sonic or his season 4 sonic? (And for that matter the MFX prop)
Because those ridges are a nightmare to reproduce. No doubt the finished product will resemble one of the two.
My point is that if this thread is going to be the place where CT's accusations of re-casting are brought to bear on Rassilon, then board members should reference the specifics of those accusations rather than just saying "there are many features" because such an approach doesn't deal with specifics, it just casts a vague cloud of suspicion.
I've just given you specifics, Stokes, you massive fucking tool. You know it, and I know it. Collins is a thief, a liar and a conniving little douche. His computer is probably full of pics with my watermark on them and all but the dumbest of dumb fucks, and you, would not see that he used mine as a basis for replication. Stop being a pathetic useless waste of space supporting an indefensible thieving carpetbagger. You contend that Collins could have seen some of these details from public pics of the prop but consider this:
If his observation is as good as you think it is and he could have seen details you would have trouble seeing in high res let alone low res, why did he replicate the same OBVIOUS mistakes that were on mine on his build if his sole source of reference were pics of the prop? Even Stevie Wonder could have seen the problem with the lower diameter and the black bulb. Answer me that, you fucking dickhead.
I sincerely hope you have your hamfisted knuckleheaded excuses for workmanship recast someday by a lying cocksucker like Collins.
If his observation is as good as you think it is and he could have seen details you would have trouble seeing in high res let alone low res, why did he replicate the same OBVIOUS mistakes that were on mine on his build if his sole source of reference were pics of the prop? Even Stevie Wonder could have seen the problem with the lower diameter and the black bulb. Answer me that, you fucking dickhead.
I sincerely hope you have your hamfisted knuckleheaded excuses for workmanship recast someday by a lying cocksucker like Collins.
"